It has its limitations, most notably that you cannot make use of MIDI generating plugins. I got Maschine because of the hardware, not the software.
I think Maschine is optimized for performance versus production. Some people would dispute it is a “real” DAW, but I find it more focused on getting the things it can do done, and not get sidetracked by all kinds of bells and whistles. I started out with Maschine (the hardware controller comes with a DAW-like sequencer software) I also found studio one suitable for live performance, rehearsal and live broadcast. Most importantly, studio one also has a pattern function, which is similar to a drumming machine. MIDI conversion audio, drag and drop can be very fast. It’s more convenient than FL Studio to change plug-in and voice Now my scaler is also allowed in studio one FL Studio Recording has always been troublesome. In terms of recording, studio one is obviously more convenient than FL Studio. You can see them in the keyboard, which brings convenience to editing. The most important thing is that many softwares are annotated in studio one. MIDI editor can edit a single track or mix multiple tracks in piano roll. You can easily search for musical instruments and effectors Unexpectedly, it took me only half an hour to do songs with studio one So when I use it, I usually make paragraphs separately and finally arrange them together.īut recently when I was editing the piano, I found a lot of problems, inconvenient. The design idea of FL Studio is to make the pattern first, then put the pattern into playlist, and finally make a complete song. I’m very familiar with FL Studio, so I didn’t think about using any other. The logic is reasonable and the operation is fast I found that studio one is very well designed. I want to share with you something that happened to me.
0 kommentar(er)
